Stacking the memory allows increasing a memory bandwidth and requires less physical space on the circuit board. GeForce GTX 980 vs Radeon R9 Fury X. Sapphire Nitro Radeon R9 Fury. Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort. Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark. Comparing the 980 Ti and Fury X shows that at stock clocks there is very little between the two cards but 980 Ti has significantly better overclocking potential where it leads by up to 25%. A small form factor allows more transistors to fit on a chip, therefore increasing its performance. EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Superclocked ACX 2.0. From what I've seen and heard, it appears that the actual hardware of the Fury X is SUPPOSED to be more powerful yet it seems to just perform like a slightly weaker 980 Ti. It is a quick-access, temporary virtual storage that can be read and changed in any order, thus enabling fast data processing. GeForce GTX 980 Ti. Bigger gains are shown in other games. The graphics card supports multi-display technology. As many of us may remember the famous Radeon HD-4870 – the world’s first graphics card that incorporated high-speed GDDR5 memory solution. GeForce GTX 980 Ti. As for power consumption, here we have almost similar picture between R9 Fury X (a bit less) and nVidia (a bit more) non-reference solutions with water-cooling. Unfortunately, this time the Fury X can’t outscore GTX 980 Ti – 700 euros vs. 670, at the time, when AMD’s solution was considered as flagship video card. It features 2816 SPUs as well as 176 Texture Address Units and 96 ROPs. In Shadow of Mordor, AMD’s Fury X doesn’t quite match the stock GTX 980 Ti in 1080p, but it ekes out a win by just under 10% in 4K mode. Each DRAM die in the stack can transfer data by way of two 128-bit-wide channels. The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. AMD says that HBM may accommodate up to 94% less space in comparison with traditional GDDRR5 modules. However, we give a credit to AMD for pioneering work that provides the manufacturer with the High Bandwidth Memory. The Radeon R9 Fury X will launch at $649.99 (the same price as the GTX 980 Ti), next week, with market availability within the following 3 weeks. The Gainward GTX 980 Ti SLI configuration averaged 84fps, 18% faster than the standard non-overclocked GTX 980 Ti SLI cards and 25% faster than the R9 Fury X Crossfire overclocked setup. I couldn't play Witcher 3 smooth at all on my R9 280x. A higher transistor count generally indicates a newer, more powerful processor. Compare all that to the Radeon R9 Fury X, which comes with core clock speeds of 1050 MHz on the GPU, and 500 MHz on the 4096 MB of HBM memory. This page is currently only available in English. The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth. Gaming. Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort. Also, I was thinking to buy a R9 Fury (non-x) but after seeing the benchmarks of R9 Fury X and that it doesn't quite beat the GTX 980 ti, would the R9 Fury really be able to beat the GTX 980? Within the next few years HBM would prevail over older systems as a new standard and there would be no limitations of GDDR5. Not to mention GTX 980 Ti water-cooling solutions – yes, they hum as well, but their hum is more deeper and not that annoying as AMD’s higher-frequency noise. A lower TDP typically means that it consumes less power. The disparity widens measurably, nearly 2x in some instances, as AMD competes at 1440p and 1080p resolutions. The graphics card uses a combination of water and air to reduce the temperature of the card. 9.2. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card. We consider a smaller width better because it assures easy maneuverability. Intro The GeForce GTX 980 Ti comes with core clock speeds of 1000 MHz on the GPU, and 1750 MHz on the 6144 MB of GDDR5 memory. OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics. Comparing the 980 Ti and Fury X shows that at stock clocks there is very little between the two cards but 980 Ti has significantly better overclocking potential where it leads by up to 25%. AMD R9 Fury X vs. GTX 980 Ti Hybrid Pump Whine Frequency Spectrum Analysis By Steve Burke Published July 02, 2015 at 3:08 pm . Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps. The GTX 980 ti, because actual performance is known. Radeon R9 FURY X. No doubt, R9 Fury X is cooler by every way than the reference air-cooled GTX 980 Ti due to pre-installed water-cooling system. 28.8 GPixel/s higher pixel rate? Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 vs Sapphire Nitro Radeon R9 Fury. AMD Radeon R9 Fury X vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti. R9 Fury X warms-up a bit longer, which just mean that it’s cooling less aggressively on the start, but the temperature continues to increase throughout the tests. Hardware Guides. Similarly, the Asus Strix R9 Fury … If the R9 Fury and the GTX 980 were both $500 cards, we’d say the R9 Fury was absolutely the better solution, particularly if you’re gaming … Actual communication with GPU is ensured by so-called interposer. Intro The GeForce GTX 980 comes with a GPU clock speed of 1126 MHz, and the 4096 MB of GDDR5 memory is set to run at 1750 MHz through a 256-bit bus. Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti better than AMD Radeon R9 390X? HDM runs at relatively low voltage – 1.3V vs. 1.5V for GDDR5 and lower clock speeds – 500MHz vs. 1750MHz for GDDR5. Which one will let you play games at high frame rates and 4K? 85.91. At 1 Gbps, that works out to 128 GB/s of bandwidth for each memory stack. Each stack, then, has an aggregate interface width of 1024 bits (versus 32 bits for a GDDR5 chip). Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display. Source: PassMark. This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory. AMD Radeon R9 Fury X vs. Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti, Black Friday Deals to Help Build the Best Custom Gaming PC (2020), AMD Ryzen 5000 Series Benchmark and Review, Creating a New Drive Volume in Windows 10, Building a Custom PC for Adobe After Effects. AMD Radeon R9 Fury X. Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti I like to play all the games on Ultra Settings and I can sacrifice anything for those Ultra Graphics. This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Desktop) - Benchmarks, Tests and Comparisons The transfer rate is also slower than GDDR5 – 1 Gbps vs. 7 Gbps. [Jun '15 GPUPro] GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R9 FURY X vs 980 Ti among Desktop GPUs. Chipsets with a higher number of transistors, semiconductor components of electronic devices, offer more computational power. A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better. First up was the Fury X, a $649 card meant to compete with the GTX 980 Ti and sporting its own custom water cooler. Which is the best card to put in your custom gaming PC? Newer versions can support more bandwidth and deliver better performance. GeForce GTX 1070. Back in their heyday of mid-2015, the GeForce GTX 980 Ti and Radeon R9 Fury X were highly desirable graphics cards. © 2000 - 2020 AVADirect Custom Computers. ... Asus GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB Phoenix Fan Edition DVI-D HDMI DP 1.4 Gaming Graphics Card (PH-GTX1050TI-4G) Graphic Cards: $129.99: Get the deal: But when it comes to non-reference designs of nVidia cards, like EVGA 980 Ti Hybrid, for example, results are surprisingly the opposite. As sad as it may be, a loud hum of the pump of R9 Fury X is always audible. Nvidia GeForce GTX 970. It’s not necessarily a bad thing – it just means the cooler doesn’t attack thermals as powerfully as the nVidia solution. This benchmark is designed to measure graphics performance. A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB are very slightly better than the AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB. Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image. Comparing the GTX 980 and 780 Ti shows that the Newer 980 offers around 14% better performance at a 25% price discount. It can be boldly said that HBM is the evolutionary step for AMD’s products and for Fury X in particular. So, let us see what AMD has accomplished this time and whether they created a real competitor to nVidia GTX 980 Ti. Overall the Fury X trades blows with the best GPUs currently available. No doubt, R9 Fury X is cooler by every way than the reference air-cooled GTX 980 Ti due to pre-installed water-cooling system. It’s been nearly two years since BTR last compared the Fury X versus the GTX 980 Ti. As resolution decreases, the Fury X’s weak point – polygon and triangle limitations – is revealed as a bottleneck. Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU. Though they were quite similar performance-wise, the GTX 980 Ti … Since then, we were all waiting impatiently for release to lay our hands on the “Red Fury” and find out. 85.93. DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics. This allows it to be overclocked more, increasing performance. Once we get actual performance numbers on Fury and 390X that may change, but we really have … When AMD announced its potential “killer” of nVidia’s GeForce GTX 980 Ti – the Radeon R9 Fury X, the whole gaming community was quite intrigued whether it is going to be for real or not. Random-access memory (RAM) is a form of volatile memory used to store working data and machine code currently in use. One of the advantages of AMD’s graphics cards was often their lower price compared to the Nvidia ones. Radeon R9 FURY X. What makes the R9 Fury X weaker than the GTX 980 Ti? When I'm not studying the latest components or industry news, I can be found biking, hiking or gaming. Source: AnandTech. Given the higher performance and lower noise and power consumption, the price can be considered as post-primary. 96 GPixel/s vs 67.2 GPixel/s 253MHz faster memory clock speed? Allows you to connect to a display using DVI. The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second. AMD Radeon R9 Fury X vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 2.97 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance, 6012MHz higher effective memory clock speed, Gigabyte Geforce GTX 1050 Ti OC 4GB GDDR5 128 Bit PCI-E Graphic Card (GV-N105TOC-4GD), MSI Computer Video Graphic Cards GeForce GTX 1050 TI GAMING X 4G, 4GB, Asus GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB Phoenix Fan Edition DVI-D HDMI DP 1.4 Gaming Graphics Card (PH-GTX1050TI-4G) Graphic Cards, MSI Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 192-bit HDMI/DP 6GB GDRR6 HDCP Support DirectX 12 Dual Fan VR Ready OC Graphics Card (GTX 1660 TI Ventus XS 6G OC), ASUS GeForce GTX 1650 4GB Phoenix Fan Overclocked Edition HDMI DP DVI Graphics Card (PH-GTX1650-O4G), PNY GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB CG EDITION Graphics Card. Gaming performance is generally a step behind the reference GTX 980 Ti when played at 4K. Although, current implementation is limited to 4GB capacity, it presents unbelievably high throughput on an unprecedented 4096-bit wide memory interface. It also features 2048 SPUs, 128 Texture Address Units, and 64 Raster Operation Units. AMD’s fans have touted their “fine wine” theory as an advantage; that as a Radeon graphics card ages, the drivers get better over time and its performance goes up. All Rights Reserved. This has been at the Fury X no significant added value compared to GDDR5 video memory, though bandwidth were increased significantly. Peripheral Component Interconnect Express (PCIe) is a high-speed interface standard for connecting components, such as graphics cards and SSDs, to a motherboard. Thus, the limitations that are valid for GDDR5 are easily will be avoided in the future. The width represents the horizontal dimension of the product. The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second. Overall the Fury X trades blows with the best GPUs currently available. AMD hat vor kurzem sein neues Grafikkarten-Monster, die Radeon R9 Fury X vorgestellt, die in der gleichen Preisklasse wie die Geforce GTX 980 Ti antritt. Even though the GTX 970 beats the 980 in terms of value, the 980 still destroys previous generation cards. 37 facts in comparison. I'm a marketing professional who loves to get down to the geeky details. Intro AMD’s “fine wine” revisited – the Fury X vs. the GTX 980 Ti. ... Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R9 FURY X vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti. Until the Radeon R9 Fury X does not fall in price, you could seriously consider GTX 980 Ti as better performer. This time, apart from a newest 28nm GPU built on Fuji technology, AMD comes first again with the High Bandwidth Memory video memory (HBM). However, exceptionally wide bandwidth makes it up for these attributes. The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed. The thermal design power (TDP) is the maximum amount of power the cooling system needs to dissipate. 7.4. HBM is so-called stacked or “3D” memory technology, which was developed by AMD in cooperation with SK Hynix – unlike GDDR5, memory chips are stacked on the graphics card and no longer applied side by side. Even in comparison with reference design on GTX 980 Ti equipped with fans, still the noise is quite notable. And in the opposite, reference design GTX 980 Ti would consume as much as twice more energy, which would require the customer to consider more powerful power supply unit. Comparing the 980 Ti and Fury X shows that at stock clocks there is very little between the two cards but 980 Ti has significantly better overclocking potential where it leads by up to 25%. This is not the first time when AMD releases their new product with innovative features. The R9 FURY … But when it comes to non-reference designs of nVidia cards, like EVGA 980 Ti Hybrid, for example, results are surprisingly the opposite. Small semiconductors provide better performance and reduced power consumption. Overall the Fury X trades blows with the best GPUs currently available. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view. In every single game tested, the R9 Fury X is offering frame-rates of at least 35 fps. Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti とSapphire Radeon R9 Fury X の比較を表示します。グラフィックカードランキング形式で、総合評価と各性能を比較してみましょう。 8.9. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti and the Radeon R9 Fury X are direct competitors, since they have the same price at about $650 USD.